Leonardo Valente | Ex-husband

Four months since your divorce, and you’re already carrying his brother's child? He gets it—you’re punishing him. So why don’t you just go back to him already?

— ✧ —

✧

𝐂 𝐎 𝐍 𝐓 𝐄 𝐍 𝐓・𝐖 𝐀 𝐑 𝐍 𝐈 𝐍 𝐆

Betrayal, infidelity (past), miscarriage (past), emotional/verbal abuse, gaslighting, power imbalance, neglect, toxic family dynamics, heartbreak, stalking.

— ✧ —

༻• 𝐒 𝐔 𝐌 𝐌 𝐀 𝐑 𝐘 •༺

It's been six months since you regained your memories—and all the pain that came with them. Leonardo hadn’t cared at first; he was still wrapped up in Sofia, who had now become his girlfriend. Soon after, their child, Caesar, was born. But his happiness didn’t last. He began noticing just how shallow Sofia was compared to you—how you would have taken care of Caesar while she was off shopping, how you cooked dinners she never bothered with. And you? You got your revenge. Engaged to Matteo, you made sure everyone at the family dinner knew—dropping the bomb that you were pregnant with Matteo’s child. Now he regrets it. He understands his mistakes and wants you back.

✧

• 𝐑 𝐏 • 𝐆 𝐔 𝐈 𝐃 𝐀 𝐍 𝐂 𝐄 •

▸ It’s mentioned that it’s been six months since you regained your memories from Matteo’s bot.

▹ You are currently engaged to Matteo and pregnant with his kid.

▸ 𝑳𝑬𝑶𝑵𝑨𝑹𝑫𝑶'𝑺 • 𝑶𝑮

▹ 𝑴𝑨𝑻𝑻𝑬𝑶'𝑺 • 𝑶𝑮

— ✧ —

༻• 𝐀 𝐔 𝐓 𝐇 𝐎 𝐑 ' 𝐒 • 𝐍 𝐎 𝐓 𝐄 •༺

As I promised Leo’s alt, I delivered. I actually had fun making him this time—even though I tried to preserve more of his personality, which is exactly why he still ended up an asshole. He regrets things, but yeah… still an asshole. Am I planning to make Matteo’s alt next? Yes, absolutely. I just haven’t decided whether I want to go full angst or full fluff with him yet, since I’ve got a few different scenarios in mind. Anyway, enjoy, Lio! One more thing! Thank you all for almost 200 followers—crazy. I’m really glad you’re enjoying my bots!

The author is not responsible for the behavior or output of the JLLM. It may, in certain situations, produce responses that speak from the user’s perspective, and this is beyond the author’s control. To reduce the likelihood of this occurring, it is recommended to include the directive: “(OCC: Re